slatestarcodex
-
- her skirt got quite a lot smaller,
but her heart is still the same
size it was before - Posts: 12359
- Joined: Jun 13, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
the 'posession of 1000 or more marijuana plants with intent to distribute' carried a minimum sentence of 10 years and the 'posession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking' carried a minimum of 5 years consecutively so the judges opinion on how dangerous he is only counted for 1/16th of the sentence
e: the case number is 4:12-mj-00303 USA v. Morales
e: the case number is 4:12-mj-00303 USA v. Morales
Re: slatestarcodex
okay but both of those minimum sentences are bullshit though
Re: slatestarcodex
he should have gotten the case thrown out on the basis of this is total bullshit
-
- her skirt got quite a lot smaller,
but her heart is still the same
size it was before - Posts: 12359
- Joined: Jun 13, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
he also got some weapons charges dropped in the plea agreement:
A gun safe in the garage contained 27 firearms including three unregistered NFA firearms -- two short barreled assault rifles and one short-barrel shotgun...Officers also found a number of explosive devices and approximately 9000 rounds of ammunition in the house
Re: slatestarcodex
I think it's a good reminder that "line goes up" is not the point of crypto and is more like an unfortunate side effect that happens to be getting all the attention because of course it is.
Re: slatestarcodex
I agree, line goes down is just as important. why no love for line goes down
Re: slatestarcodex
The thing about currencies is you don't want the line to go anywhere in a hurry.
-
- "I don’t believe that we will lose life or have to discard cards ourselves."
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Nov 30, 2019
Re: slatestarcodex
they made The Big Short movie all about love for line goes down
-
- her skirt got quite a lot smaller,
but her heart is still the same
size it was before - Posts: 12359
- Joined: Jun 13, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
the guy in the big short said you shouldn’t be happy about line goes down
-
- "I don’t believe that we will lose life or have to discard cards ourselves."
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Nov 30, 2019
Re: slatestarcodex
some other guys in it said you should though, so its impossible to tell if line going down is good or bad
Re: slatestarcodex
well depends on the value of the projects if they actually do what they are trying to do (which he doesn't talk about), but yeah i feel you hereJeb Bush 2012 wrote:“more optimistic” if you prefer. the point I’m making that “not a proven ponzi” is a very low bar, and “only a few % of these projects are proven ponzis” is a strong condemnation of it, and certainly doesn’t imply there’s anything worthwhile in the ecosystemCrunchums wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:22 am i don't think he's saying you should be optimistic about crypto, he's saying that you should be less than infinitely hostile towards crypto. motte bailey potential here though for sure. but like i am super hostile to crypto because it's mostly scams, so what are we even arguing about here
shrug okmoney =/= the financial system. when people talk about the crypto financial system recreating the traditional financial system but worse in every way, that means crypto banks/investment funds &c
u gotta skate
-
- Posting Automaton
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Jun 24, 2020
Re: slatestarcodex
I agree the sentence should be shorter, but grenade launchers are illegal for a good reason and we shouldn’t have to wait until someone fires them to put them away if they decide to illegally acquire them
-
- .
How'd you know that loving kittens is my one defining trait? - Posts: 11770
- Joined: Sep 03, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
i agree with a lot of these criticisms of the article except that some of them seem to imply that the article indicates you should buy crypto, which i didn't see it indicating anywhere. the conclusion i saw was to be less than infinitely hostile to crypto
wow, [you]. that all sounds terrible. i hope it gets better for you
Re: slatestarcodex
can i keep being infinitely hostile to proof of work crypto
Re: slatestarcodex
ok but can i infinitely approach that level of hostility
-
- Posting Automaton
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Jun 24, 2020
Re: slatestarcodex
I think the article suggests that if you are worried about authoritarianism in the us you should buy crypto. certainly crunchums seemed to take that from it, which is why I was arguing against that idea
and "don't be infinitely hostile to crypto" is the bailey here, he certainly tries to paint dismissal of the worth of crypto finance and the ecosystem of crypto projects as unreasonable even though that doesn't necessarily entail being infinitely hostile to crypto
-
- her skirt got quite a lot smaller,
but her heart is still the same
size it was before - Posts: 12359
- Joined: Jun 13, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
Assuming that there is a threat of authoritarianism in the United States, it seems helpful to buy crypto before the authoritarians shut down your bank account
Re: slatestarcodex
i still think it's reasonable to hold some crypto as a hedge against catastrophic things happening in the US (either in general or to you in particular) because there are some scenarios where it would be a good thing to have doneJeb Bush 2012 wrote:I think the article suggests that if you are worried about authoritarianism in the us you should buy crypto. certainly crunchums seemed to take that from it, which is why I was arguing against that idea
u gotta skate
Re: slatestarcodex
i think if you're afraid of your money losing all of its value all at once you probably should do the opposite of buy crypto
can't you just buy another currency if you're worried about the USD specifically crashing
can't you just buy another currency if you're worried about the USD specifically crashing
Re: slatestarcodex
where am i holding that money? if it's in a bank account that has some of the same vulnerabilities. but it's true that if the dollar explodes or something it would be kinda weird to expect bitcoin to be the new things instead of like canadian dollars or somethingKhaos wrote:can't you just buy another currency if you're worried about the USD specifically crashing
u gotta skate
Re: slatestarcodex
somewhere where it isn't easily stolenCrunchums wrote:where am i holding that money?
-
- Posting Automaton
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Jun 24, 2020
Re: slatestarcodex
I think if you're worried about like, all US assets becoming worthless I'd rather have a) money abroad b) idk gems or something if you can't do a). I also don't think this is a reasonable thing to be preparing for in the current US, it requires much stronger conditions than being worried about the health of american democracy (I found his attempt to insinuate hypocrisy particularly annoying here for this reason)
-
- her skirt got quite a lot smaller,
but her heart is still the same
size it was before - Posts: 12359
- Joined: Jun 13, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
drastic currency inflation and government measures to expropriate hedges against currency inflation often walk together. If you predicted that the US would break the gold standard, holding your wealth in gold might seem like a good idea but whoops, FDR signed an executive order saying you must turn over your gold to the government at a set rate.
so the resistance of bitcoin to government control is pretty relevant in scenarios of drastic inflation imo
so the resistance of bitcoin to government control is pretty relevant in scenarios of drastic inflation imo
-
- her skirt got quite a lot smaller,
but her heart is still the same
size it was before - Posts: 12359
- Joined: Jun 13, 2018
Re: slatestarcodex
I kind of forgot about this but here's a relevant twitter threadCrunchums wrote: ↑Fri Dec 02, 2022 8:16 pm https://thezvi.wordpress.com/2022/12/02 ... lease-day/ fun
(also still curious to see Rylinks respond to my last post)
Re: slatestarcodex
a 104 tweet thread, eh
not very compelling to me1. I read a moderate amount of philosophy of ethics, and my considered opinion is that the "big three" (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) are all bad. All of them other than virtue ethics are *very* bad.
2. The reason Virtue Ethics is better than the others is that it at least admits to the complexity of the problem. Ethics is among the most complicated and poorly understood domains we have, and even far simpler and clearer domains cannot be reduced to simple decision rules.
3. Virtue ethics at least starts from the premise "What if we treat ethical behavior as if it were like any other skilled practice, and look at how people learn and develop such practices?", which is the only starting point that can possibly work.
u gotta skate
-
- Posting Automaton
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Jun 24, 2020
Re: slatestarcodex
look at that guy without virtue
Re: slatestarcodex
(https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/open-thread-254)4: A common response to my post on cryptocurrency is that while there are some theoretical and actual good uses for cryptocurrency, the vast majority of existing crypto has nothing to do with this and is pointless (or mostly-pointless) speculation. I agree with this perspective, and wanted to do so publicly in case my last post sounded too rosy.
u gotta skate
Re: slatestarcodex
Zvi wrote:I wanted my game, Emergents, to have the players chat with each other. Yeah, no. That’s not remotely legal in practice, letting people talk to each other.